The Dowling Review report was launched yesterday, making a number of recommendations on how university-business research collaborations can be better encouraged and supported in the UK. They include simplifying the support available to academics and industry, better rewards for people who collaborate, more funding, improvements to tech transfer, and better coordination of Government policies. The recommendations are targeted at public and private organisations across Government and the research community.
Tag Archives: Industry
1E are a Software Lifecycle Automation company that empower the world’s largest and most distributed organisations to simplify and speed up the complete software lifecycle. With regional offices in New York, Dublin and New Delhi, their global headquarters are in West London.
Their customers consist of public and private sector companies, including Dell, ING, Nestlé, BNP Paribas, Ford Motor Company and the UK Department of Work and Pensions, who they have helped save more than $2.5bn through the use of their technology. Read More
Election 2015 – Policy Briefings
Ahead of the 2015 Election, the Campaign for Science and Engineering has worked with its members and collaborators to develop a toolkit that government can use to realise its ambition to make the UK a leading scientific nation.
Every major political party has put science and engineering at the heart of their plans for a prosperous innovative Britain, driving high skills jobs and growth. Read More
Speech by Lord Heseltine to the Campaign for Science and Engineering, Science Museum IMAX Theatre, 27th November 2012. Sponsored by Airbus and EADS
Thank you for inviting me and it is a pleasure to be here. Read More
It’s no secret that the UK’s economy is a mess. What’s more of a surprise is that, four years into the crisis, the debate on what to do about the economy is still missing the point. While politicians and economists debate the virtues of Plan A and Plan B, austerity and stimulus, they’re missing something that may be obvious to engineers and scientists: that the real source of sustainable economic growth and societal progress isn’t short-term economic tinkering. It’s innovation. Read More
The following is CaSE’s submission to the Liberal Democrat science policy review, dated 20th February 2012. You can access a PDF version of the submission here.
Thank you for your letter of 31st January 2012 inviting CaSE to contribute to your update of Liberal Democrat science policy. I have enclosed some of our reflections on the current state of UK science policy in the three keys areas you identified – money, people, and science in policy – as well as recommendations which we hope your party will be able to implement in Government and for your next manifesto. I hope they are of use to you.
In an article in today’s Times Higher Education (THE), CaSE Director Imran Khan has called on the science and engineering community to set out a renewed argument for investment.
In the lead-up to the 2010 Spending Review, CaSE and others secured a cash-freeze for science and engineering budgets, avoiding damaging cuts which the sector had previously feared. However this campaign was only partially successful; these budgets are still being eroded due to inflation and huge cuts to research capital funding.
Yesterday (8th December), CaSE Director Imran Khan wrote an online article for the Guardian, calling on the the government to re-invest the upcoming multibillion pound windfall it will receive from auctioning off airwaves to mobile phone operators (otherwise known as 4G technology), and put the proceeds back into British science and engineering. Read More
David Cameron, Life Sciences Strategy Launch
Following the focus on the Life Sciences in the Growth Plan, the publication of today’s Life Sciences strategy and the Prime Minister’s speech provide more details on how the Government plans to build on this important area. You can read CaSE Director Imran Khan’s comments here.
The study carries some important messages – highlighting, for instance, the importance of moving away from a debt-driven society and the opportunities and challenges resulting from the growth of Eastern economies.
This is CaSE’s response to the HM Treasury consultation on R&D Tax Credits. We believe that the UK must become a knowledge-intensive economy if it is to be internationally competitive in the years to come, and it is therefore crucial that the tax system incentivises research and development activity in the private sector.
Government SET Statistics show that in 2008, 1.8% of UK GDP was spent on R&D. This compares to 3.4% in Japan, 2.8% in the USA, and 2.6% in Germany. Looking at R&D performed by business alone, the figures are 1.1% for the UK, 2.7% for Japan, 2% for the USA, and 1.3% for France. These figures underline the importance of incentivising R&D in the UK.
A medical laser device for the permanent removal of body hair has found new life as a home-based cosmetic treatment that is one of the best-selling products in Boots. The device was invented in Swansea and manufactured at the Sony site in Pencoed, Bridgend.
This is an example of a successful collaboration model involving the private sector working with the Higher Education sector, resulting in the production of patents and marketing new products. The Swansea University Institute of Life Sciences have attracted over £113 million of investment, much of that from the private sector. The medical laser device was developed from research using a super computer installed by IBM. It is fantastic to see commercial applications resulting from this investment.
There is a growing belief that we are entering a new global age of the scientist and engineer as entrepreneur, if only because there is no more easy money to be had from property or from money itself. With this in mind surely this is the time to make all our science in Northern Ireland count – particularly as we try to rebalance and grow a private sector led economy.
In this context it is incumbent on our politicians and decision makers to foster an environment where science and engineering can flourish for the good of us all.
Alan Hughes is Director of both the UK Innovation Research Centre and the Centre for Business Research, Judge Business School, University of Cambridge
It is a commonplace to argue that whist the UK university system produces excellent research it does not do well in relation to its interconnections with industry. The potential for wealth creation is, it is claimed, lost by weak and diffused knowledge exchange patterns and an unwillingness of academics to interact with external organisations.
There is in particular the view that the UK has much to learn from the US where, it is argued, a much deeper and more productive set of interrelationships exists between entrepreneurially minded universities and academics and the American business sector. There is, indeed, some evidence to suggest that US businesses do place a higher value on their university-based interactions and invest more of their own resources in supporting them than is the case in the UK (Cosh and Hughes, 2010). Read More
In a letter to The Times newspaper, published today, senior figures from some of the UK’s top science and engineering firms made the case for continued public support for science and engineering. Between them, the companies account for almost a third of all corporate spending on R&D in the UK – more than twice the Government’s science budget.
The letter was instigated and coordinated by the Campaign for Science and Engineering. It is available on the The Times website, and reads:
Sir, The UK’s private sector invests £16 billion in research and development and employs 150,000 people. Our companies are careful about where they invest. We value the scientific and engineering talent that flows from the UK’s world-class universities and publicly funded research base, and how the tax regime supports research and development investment.