CaSE letter on academic diplomas published in TES
02 Nov 2007
The announcement of new academic diplomas may be politically useful in encouraging universities and employers to accept vocational ones. It is less clear how useful academic diplomas will be in advancing education – particularly science education.
The fall-out of similar upheavals – the introduction of combined science GCSEs in 1990 and of AS-levels in Curriculum 2000, had extremely negative consequences for the study of science.
Expanding the diploma programme before it has even started in most schools is typical of this government and mirrors the premature rolling-out of the new GCSE science curricula after just one year of piloting.
In practical terms, the complexity of schools working in consortia with employers to provide 17 qualifications at three levels is mind-boggling.
Science diplomas may encourage a broader science and maths background prior to university, but at the cost of fewer students. Evidence, rather than political motives, should drive decisions about science teaching.
Dr Hilary Leevers, Acting Director

Related resources

This briefing summarises attitudes to immigration, international students and researchers, and their impact on UK R&D. It is based on evidence from a nationally representative survey of 4,100 UK adults in June 2024 and two focus groups in December 2024.

This report sets out evidence on the integral role of R&D in driving progress on the UK Government’s missions.

CaSE has taken a look at what the latest numbers of students taking A-level, GCSE, and Scottish Highers and Advanced Highers in STEM-related subjects means for ongoing trends in STEM education.

CaSE’s latest public opinion poll, carried out during the election campaign in June 2024, explores the UK public’s feelings about international students and researchers coming to UK universities.